On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 00:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Oooooh, a very good idea indeed! We'll have to look at that eventually. > > The mechanism you describe is preferable, but it should be noted that > subversion properties are easily accessible using the clients. > > So long as said properties are human readable/writable, that's also an > option. > > The main issue for me (And many others I suppose), is the fact that every > single object type I use is either completely custom, or a monkey patched > version of a built-in type (Notably OFS.Image for instance). > > So there would have to be a reliable serializer for "other" objects, which I > beleive you already have, so that's OK :)
i dunno if you use or have tried archetypes, but it has experimental support for generating the needed ape structures from its schema.. see archgenxml and archetypes/apesupport.. its pretty cool actually you cane go from a uml model straight to a content model with support. http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/archetypes/Archetypes/ApeSupport.py?rev=1.6&view=auto cheers, -kapil _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
