Well there you go, perfect :)

-----Original Message-----
From: Kapil Thangavelu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 14, 2004 6:49 AM
Subject: RE: Zope + Ape + Subversion (was: RE: [Zope-dev] Using a truely
r evis ion based storage for Zope ?)

On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 20:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
> Hmmm, well it's as stable as Ape and Subversion are respectively :)
> I wouldn't call it stable no, it's something I did over the long week-end
> just had, and that's about it :)
> Ape is at 0.8 and therefore becoming quite mature, I'd have to let others
> speak as to it stability however ...
> Subversion is also probably quite stable (It just reached 1.0), though I
> don't know how heavily tested it's been in a long running process (Might
> have some memeory leaks ?) ...

the svn apache server model is a long running process and is fairly
stable on memory usage. the python bindings require doing some manual
memory management, but the pool api makes it easy to deallocate
arbitrary allocations safely. the cmfsvnbrowser code i ref'd early has
been in production by myself and others for almost a year and runs with
a stable memory footprint.


Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to