On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 15:23, Jim Fulton wrote:
2. Convert the mainline history, but leave off the branches.
Would this mean we'd lose the log messages too? If so -1 because often merge messages aren't very helpful. "merged foo-bar-branch to head" would suck if you couldn't at least see the log messages on that branch.
Otherwise, -0. Disk is cheap but history priceless.
You aren't counting the cost of clutter. Option 3 says "history prior to the CVS -> SVN migration remains in CVS". We are committed to leaving the existing CVS repository in place *forever* (or until the 2.7 branch dies, whichever comes first ;).
-1 on merging *any* history prior to the creation of the 2.7 branch to SVN; -0 on merging the mainline since then.
Tres. -- =============================================================== Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zope Corporation "Zope Dealers" http://www.zope.com
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
