I keep getting these negative email messages. Here is the most recent
>I think you should stop dreaming and face the reality. There is almost
nobody interested of the developer community in ZClasses.. I have no
idea what your >goal is with your ongoing ZClasses postings..you're on
siding and there is no way back.
My goal is to deliver maintain and expand the software my business needs
to run. In particular I am looking for a very very fast development
environment, so whatever changes a client needs, I can make right away.
So I literally do not understand why people think ZClasses are dead.
Let me go through the possible reasons. The last one is the real reason
1. There is no demand for a through the web development environment that
I just don't believe that.
2. ZClasses have the following bug.
That sounds better. That bug needs to get fixed. I have yet to be hurt
by a ZClass bug. Although there are some features I now want.
3. There is no one to maintain ZClasses
Again not true, I need to do it for my own interests. I am at the
point where I want to upgrade ZClasses.
4. ZClasses is a single user development environment.
That is right, and I am a single user developer. Part time at that, I
recruit the rest of the time. And I am looking for some good python
developers if you are interested. The only reason I can do both jobs is
that ZClasses allow me to develop my applications very fast.
5. You have to do everything in Python Classes on the file system.
That is the right way to do things.
Dogma has its place, but I have long since left organized religion. OUCH!
6. We are moving ZClasses out of the core.
Makes sense to me.
AND HERE IS THE REAL ISSUE I THINK
7. Because of the way Zope is written, you just cannot do ZClasses
"right". You would have to change zope, and break lots of things.
I think that is the core reason that some people say ZClasses are
dead. I am just starting to understand it. I have been digging into
the core of Zope. I keep excavating lower than I have ever excavated
before. I would like to make a tree of classes, just like in the
smalltalk browsers. Zope Products manager or whatever it is called does
not like that. I would like a ZClass to have a subobject for every
instance variable, and for that instance variable to say which role can
read, and write it, independent of where you are in the ZODB tree. Not
quite how Zope permissions work. So I think the structure of Zope
prevents ZClasses from working correctly. Which is why ZClasses needs
to die. Is that correct?
Because to change the core of Zope is way too heretical. Better for
ZClasses to die, than to change the core of Zope 2.
Anyhow I would be grateful if any of the ZClasses-are-dead community
would be more specific. Which reason makes you think that ZClasses are
Does anyone out there agree with my analysis?
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -