On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 16:51 -0400, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 10:23:00PM +0200, Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
> > Wait. zope.schema really shouldn't know about terms. Terms are about 
> > the user interface, hence title/token. That has really *nothing* to do 
> > with zope.schema. For searching you don't need titles or tokens. For a 
> > search *UI* you do, but that doesn't belong to zope.schema either.
> Are you arguing that zope.schema.Field should not have a title
> attribute?

IMHO he is not. To me that idea feels like architecture astronaucy.
However, I think we do have a couple of cases where the field's title
doesn't directly become the widget's title.

But then again, a static title that doesn't tie the schema framework to
the interaction is fine by me.

I guess there's some 80/20 rule at work here. Or at least 99/1.


Christian Theune · [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany
http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 7 · fax +49 345 1229889 1
Zope and Plone consulting and development

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to