On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 16:51 -0400, Marius Gedminas wrote: > On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 10:23:00PM +0200, Christian Zagrodnick wrote: > > Wait. zope.schema really shouldn't know about terms. Terms are about > > the user interface, hence title/token. That has really *nothing* to do > > with zope.schema. For searching you don't need titles or tokens. For a > > search *UI* you do, but that doesn't belong to zope.schema either. > > Are you arguing that zope.schema.Field should not have a title > attribute?
IMHO he is not. To me that idea feels like architecture astronaucy. However, I think we do have a couple of cases where the field's title doesn't directly become the widget's title. But then again, a static title that doesn't tie the schema framework to the interaction is fine by me. I guess there's some 80/20 rule at work here. Or at least 99/1. Christian -- Christian Theune · [EMAIL PROTECTED] gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 7 · fax +49 345 1229889 1 Zope and Plone consulting and development
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
