On 2008-09-01 06:58:16 +0200, Christian Theune <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> sorry for removing all the quotes, but I need to clarify your baseline
> question a bit.
> On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 23:23 +0200, Roger Ineichen wrote:
>> Yes exactly, it's up to the developer how they implement something
>> useful for handle ISource objects.
>> If it comes to implement a widget framework is looks a little bit
>> different. A widget framework can define an API which othter can use.
>> ITerms in zope.app.form does that already. You can do what ever
>> you need to do in such an ITerms adapter for access the ISource and
>> return standard ITerm objects which the widget can handle.
>> The ITrems is a standard API for handle ISource, doesn't nmatter
>> how you will query or get our data form an ISource.
> This sounds like you want to implement something different than ITerms
> but that you see a structural similarity between what you want and what
> ITerms already do.
> I think this causes some confusion (and resistance by my side) right
> Can you try to phrase what you want to achieve and maybe not use the
> word 'ITerms' (for now)?
Right. What's the difference from the ITerms we have now? Why do I need it?
Christian Zagrodnick · [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany
http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 4 · fax +49 345 1229889 1
Zope and Plone consulting and development
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -