Hi Fabio

The funkload tests were project specific. I plan to write up my findings
and to do benchmarks on a standard Plone instance and blog about it.
This will unfortunately have to wait since I'm on holiday this week :-)

-- 
Roché Compaan
Upfront Systems                   http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za

On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 15:54 -0200, Fabio Rizzo Matos wrote:
> Hi Roché,
> 
> I can see your funkload profile?
> 
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Roché Compaan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>         On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 09:20 +0200, Hedley Roos wrote:
>         > > Have you measures the time needs for some "standard"
>         ZCatalog queries
>         > > used with a Plone site with the communication overhead
>         with memcached?
>         > > Generally spoken: I think the ZCatalog is in general fast.
>         Queries using a
>         > > fulltext index are known to be more expensive or if you
>         have to deal with
>         > > large resultsets or complex queries.
>         > >
>         >
>         > No I haven't. Roche Compaan has done extensive benchmarking
>         using
>         > funkload testing plain catalog vs module level cache vs
>         memcached, but
>         > the tests are more about page serving than catalog query
>         time. I'll
>         > ask him to comment more on that.
>         
>         
>         I actually did some profiling as well and catalog searches
>         were just too
>         damn slow. The average execution time for searchResults was
>         100
>         milliseconds and this is why I told Hedley we should do some
>         caching at
>         query level in the first place. I experimented with this idea
>         a couple
>         of years back but wasn't successful due to inexperience. I was
>         trying to
>         cache brains which obviously leads to persistency bugs. This
>         time around
>         it was obvious to me that we should cache the IISet result
>         sets.
>         
>         I suspect specific indexes are just performing suboptimally
>         and needs to
>         be improved. ExtendPathIndex in Plone seems to be one of them.
>         
>         The effect on performance is really awesome, now we just need
>         to fine
>         tune the implementation.
>         
>         --
>         Roché Compaan
>         Upfront Systems
>         http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za
>         
>         
>         _______________________________________________
>         Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
>         http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
>         **  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
>         (Related lists -
>          http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
>          http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
>         
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Fábio Rizzo Matos
> ThreePointsWeb
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.threepointsweb.com
> +55 61 3202-6480
> 
> Python, Zope e Plone com quem entende do assunto!
> _______________________________________________
> Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
> http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
> **  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
> (Related lists - 
>  http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
>  http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to