-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Oct 27, 2008, at 13:32 , Roché Compaan wrote:

> On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 13:23 +0100, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>> When it comes to integrating anything in Zope itself I'd choose the
>> latter.
>
> Sure, we're not trying to get this into Zope, we're just sharing our
> experience and exploring the territory so that one can produce a third
> party package that really help people with the same use case (which I
> suspect is quite common one).

Right, it's perfectly valid to create such a third party package. The  
discussion just highlights a greater issue. Personally, I don't think  
it's good practice to focus on the expediency of working around a  
problem as opposed to tackling the problem directly. The Zope world is  
littered with add-ons that act as band-aids on real or perceived  
shortcomings in Zope itself.

jens


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAkkFtvQACgkQRAx5nvEhZLLOrwCaA+X3iGaTDmyt3vP4q93OoTfx
CNsAoJXppoHwI17ISetv4iAwoJeb+Phd
=auan
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to