-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Oct 27, 2008, at 13:32 , Roché Compaan wrote: > On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 13:23 +0100, Jens Vagelpohl wrote: >> When it comes to integrating anything in Zope itself I'd choose the >> latter. > > Sure, we're not trying to get this into Zope, we're just sharing our > experience and exploring the territory so that one can produce a third > party package that really help people with the same use case (which I > suspect is quite common one). Right, it's perfectly valid to create such a third party package. The discussion just highlights a greater issue. Personally, I don't think it's good practice to focus on the expediency of working around a problem as opposed to tackling the problem directly. The Zope world is littered with add-ons that act as band-aids on real or perceived shortcomings in Zope itself. jens -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkkFtvQACgkQRAx5nvEhZLLOrwCaA+X3iGaTDmyt3vP4q93OoTfx CNsAoJXppoHwI17ISetv4iAwoJeb+Phd =auan -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
