On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Gary Poster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 8, 2008, at 9:02 AM, Benji York wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Christian Zagrodnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>> Log message for revision 93722:
>>> - Switched to Zope 3.4 KGS.
>>> - New lines are no longer stripped in XML and HTML code contained in a
>>>  textarea; requires ClientForm >= 0.2.10 (LP #268139).
>> This revision make the buildout fail with
>>  Error: Couldn't find a distribution for 'ClientForm>=0.2.10'.
>> I suspect you had that version of ClientForm in your cache and didn't
>> realize that it is not available in the KGS index.
>> Even if we fixed that, I don't want to require a particular version of
>> ClientForm in testbrowser.  There's no need to impose a newer version on
>> people who don't need it.  Anyone who does need the bug fix can specify
>> the newer version in their project.
> FWIW, I disagree.  The specification that you removed is exactly the sort of
> thing that I think is appropriate in setup.py.  The tests will now fail (I
> assume, since I believe Christian Z added testbrowser tests for the failure
> caused by the ClientForm bug) with a lower version of ClientForm, so it is
> appropriate to set the value in setup.py.

Nope, the tests will pass in the zope.testbrowser buildout.

However, if a testbrowser user for some reason run the testbrowser tests
outside of its buildout, then you're right, they may see a failure if
their versions aren't new enough.  At that point I would hope they would
read the CHANGES.txt and see that a new version is required.

The trade off is in requiring people to upgrade a dependency in order to
get a bug fix that they may not care about.

In the large, this is the problem with specifying versions in setup.py.
Doing so assumes too much about how people are using all the
dependencies involved.

Here's a scenario:  I fix a bug in some package, it depends on a newer
version of say, zope.publisher.  I put that requirement in my package's
setup.py.  A user of my package upgrades to get an unrelated bug fix and
is forced to use the newer zope.publisher.  It so happens that that the
new version of zope.publisher has a different bug that bites them.  They
now are in a bad spot.

If the setup.py hadn't specified a version then the programmer could
have constructed a set of versions that didn't exhibit any bugs that
bite them, but they're precluded from doing that.
Benji York
Senior Software Engineer
Zope Corporation
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to