Benji York wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Martijn Faassen
> <faas...@startifact.com> wrote:
>> No, not there either, as zope.configuration doesn't define *any*
>> directives except the basic ones like 'include' and 'configure'. If you
>> would implement zope 3's directives in zope.configuration it'd start
>> pulling in dependencies like crazies, creating more dependency cycles.
>> I think a new package might be in order.
> How about a namespace package zope.zcml?
I think something like this would be a good idea. Though grokcore.*
packages would also depend on some of the configuration actions defined
there and they don't use ZCML themselves, it wouldn't pull in any
dependencies that they wouldn't already need anyway.
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -