On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Martijn Faassen <faas...@startifact.com> wrote: > Benji York wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Martijn Faassen >> <faas...@startifact.com> wrote: >> >>> No, not there either, as zope.configuration doesn't define *any* >>> directives except the basic ones like 'include' and 'configure'. If you >>> would implement zope 3's directives in zope.configuration it'd start >>> pulling in dependencies like crazies, creating more dependency cycles. >>> >>> I think a new package might be in order. >> >> How about a namespace package zope.zcml? > > I think something like this would be a good idea. Though grokcore.* > packages would also depend on some of the configuration actions defined > there and they don't use ZCML themselves, it wouldn't pull in any > dependencies that they wouldn't already need anyway.
Crazier idea: make the namespace package "zcml". -- Benji York Senior Software Engineer Zope Corporation _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
