On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Martijn Faassen <faas...@startifact.com> wrote:
> Benji York wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Martijn Faassen
>> <faas...@startifact.com> wrote:
>>> No, not there either, as zope.configuration doesn't define *any*
>>> directives except the basic ones like 'include' and 'configure'. If you
>>> would implement zope 3's directives in zope.configuration it'd start
>>> pulling in dependencies like crazies, creating more dependency cycles.
>>> I think a new package might be in order.
>> How about a namespace package zope.zcml?
> I think something like this would be a good idea. Though grokcore.*
> packages would also depend on some of the configuration actions defined
> there and they don't use ZCML themselves, it wouldn't pull in any
> dependencies that they wouldn't already need anyway.

Crazier idea: make the namespace package "zcml".
Benji York
Senior Software Engineer
Zope Corporation
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to