2009/2/2 Stephan Richter <srich...@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu>:
> On Monday 02 February 2009, Dan Korostelev wrote:
>> 2009/2/2 Stephan Richter <srich...@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu>:
>> > Yeah, the unversioned links are the only ones that I did not maintain.
>> > You now use a reference to the version directly.
>>
>> BTW, why so? It's quite handy to be able to say - "just use the latest
>> release from the 3.4 branch, whatever version number it has", because
>> there are bug fixes and no backward-incompatibilites expected.
>
> Nobody reacted to my E-mail when I asked for feedback. It was extra work and I
> tried to limit the scope of coding as much as possible. You don't want to
> know how much time I put into this release as it is.

Hey, no offence meant! The current state is great for me, personally,
I just asked :)

Sorry, I missed that email. But you guys did a great work preparing
zope.release.

-- 
WBR, Dan Korostelev
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to