On Monday 02 March 2009, Martijn Faassen wrote: > If you say we shouldn't maintain a known good set, then other systems > building on top of this will need to maintain their independent lists > all by themselves, and there's less chance that Zope 2's, Zope 3's and > Grok's list will agree. I think such an agreement is a good idea.
I totally agree. In fact we even have an example of this happening. Zope Corp., at some point, maintained an internal list of package versions (before the KGS existed). The community largely worked with the latest released packages. So both Benji (for ZC) and I were working on zc.testbrowser and we were constantly fixing test breakages when the other person made a checkin, because the different package sets produced different output. Having one overall accepted KGS for the entire community to test with, is a great common denominator that also makes debugging a lot easier. Regards, Stephan -- Stephan Richter Web Software Design, Development and Training Google me. "Zope Stephan Richter" _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
