Dan Korostelev wrote: > 2009/3/10 Hanno Schlichting <hanno...@hannosch.eu>: >> Either you have a dependency and declare it or you don't have a >> dependency. Since we don't want to use "extras" anymore, I think this >> calls for another package which depends on zope.password and zope.schema. > > I still don't like/get the idea of creating and maintaining extra > package that merely contains a vocabulary factory for another package. > Whatever, I reverted that change. Roger, just exclude > zope.app.authentication's "password.zcml" file, include > "zope.password" explicitly and define your own vocabulary.
I don't quite like the idea of extras and we decided to avoid them. We also decided to avoid tests_require from what I understand. What you did was to not specify an extra nor a hard dependency, but still add zope.schema to the test extra section. That feels wrong. Either you have a dependency and so have the tests or you don't. I think extras have been created for this kind of use-case of providing an "optional feature" from a package. Either we use that mechanism and declare it, or we don't want this mechanism and live with creating extra packages instead. Hanno _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )