2009/3/11 Martijn Faassen <faas...@startifact.com>:
> Hi there,
> Okay, having read the whole thread, there seem to be two forces pulling
> on zope.password:
> * it'd be nice if zope.password had the vocabulary so that you didn't
> have to include zope.app.authentication anymore just to get it.
> * it'd be nice if zope.password didn't need any extra dependencies,
> including zope.component and zope.schema.
> I think the latter is the least important right now, especially since
> zope.component and zope.schema are already very foundational libraries.
> So just add the vocabulary to zope.password if that is the only new
> dependencies it will pull in as a result.

I've moved the vocabulary to zope.password again, but I done the
"extra" for now, until the final decision will be made.

> In my opinion going for an extra here just to avoid this is speculating
> a bit too much right now. Do we really have users that want to use
> zope.password and really don't want zope.component and zope.schema? If
> so, we'll hear from them when they speak up and *then* declare an extra
> or take some other action.

Well, as I said before, I wanted to use zope.password in my old Pylons
application that only uses zope.interface currently. I don't expect it
to be developed in more zope-ish way (though I don't expect it to be
developed much in near future :)), so I'd like to avoid these

WBR, Dan Korostelev
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to