On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 21:36 +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Sidnei da Silva wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Wichert Akkerman <wich...@wiggy.net> wrote:
> > > I would like to see a move away from zope testing frameworks to a more
> > > standard testing infrastructure: setup.py test, possibly combined with
> > > using nose.
> > >
> > > Wichert.
> > 
> > Be aware of nose issue #102:
> > 
> >   http://code.google.com/p/python-nose/issues/detail?id=102
> 
> Is there a particular reason to keep using the test_suite convention?
> Personally I much prefer nose's habit of automatically picking up
> tests.

I think there is not. One of the reasons I refactored the test runner a
while ago was to make it possible to support a less-boilerplate-heavy
scheme of getting tests set up.

Christian

-- 
Christian Theune · c...@gocept.com
gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany
http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 7 · fax +49 345 1229889 1
Zope and Plone consulting and development

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to