On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 21:36 +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Sidnei da Silva wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Wichert Akkerman <wich...@wiggy.net> wrote: > > > I would like to see a move away from zope testing frameworks to a more > > > standard testing infrastructure: setup.py test, possibly combined with > > > using nose. > > > > > > Wichert. > > > > Be aware of nose issue #102: > > > > http://code.google.com/p/python-nose/issues/detail?id=102 > > Is there a particular reason to keep using the test_suite convention? > Personally I much prefer nose's habit of automatically picking up > tests.
I think there is not. One of the reasons I refactored the test runner a while ago was to make it possible to support a less-boilerplate-heavy scheme of getting tests set up. Christian -- Christian Theune · c...@gocept.com gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 7 · fax +49 345 1229889 1 Zope and Plone consulting and development
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
