-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Tobias Rodäbel wrote:
> Shane Hathaway wrote:
> > Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> >> Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> >>> I'ld rather not see a whole slew of extra packagse appear. I also
> >>> how the extra number of packages and increasing size of sys.path
> >>> influence performance and restrictions on environments like GAE.
> >> For environments like GAE you don't want setuptools and its magic
> to be
> >> part of your application. This is were repackaging your entire app
> >> one zipped egg or some other flat structure comes in handy.
> >> Setuptools and eggs are a distribution format from my point of view.
> >> They are certainly not the best way to deploy your applications. The
> >> growing sys.path is affecting performance to some degree in all
> >> deployment environments.
> > Well, zc.buildout ought to be able to eliminate this concern for GAE
> > deployment. I haven't tried the recipe below, but it certainly seems
> > like the right idea.
> > http://pypi.python.org/pypi/rod.recipe.appengine
> I released a new version today. It's a lot easier now to use several
> eggs within gae. This test thingy http://zpttest.appspot.com/ uses
> zope.interface and zope.pagetemplate plus their dependencies. I'm
> planning to release another sample project maybe during easter
> holidays. It's much more fun since you zope people cleaned up a lot of
> dependencies and unveiled zc.buildout. Thanks!
Cool! You should be able to use zope.component there in its latest
incarnation, too: the C bits are all optional at this point.
Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -