Hey there, Tim Hoffman wrote: [snip] > One question before I go. I had to replace about 90% of > zope.security (well get rid of it) > what would be the best way of specifying a replacement for a core > package like zope.security rather than just replacing it. > > If I wanted to share this work it would be a but confusing to call it > zope.security, and it is a bit much to monkey patch.? > Should I call it something like call it something like > z3c.gae.security and just tell people to install it in zope.security ?
This is an interesting question. Would it be possible to make changes in zope.security itself so that there's is a "do-nothing" Python version available when you install it on GAE? zope.security is a bit like middleware in that much of your app will continue to work if you don't use it. We could simply recognize this in zope.security and have a mode for it so it doesn't actually create security proxies. Regards, Martijn _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )