On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 16:09, Andreas Jung <li...@zopyx.com> wrote:
> On 29.04.2009 15:28 Uhr, Chris Withers wrote:
>> Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>>> Chris Withers wrote:
>>>> I'm also about -sys.maxint on these changes for Zope 2.12 as I'd like to
>>>> see 2.12 out the door as soon as possible.
>>> Then we have a conflict of interest. My main goal for Zope 2.12 is to be
>>> based on the Zope Toolkit 1.0 release and loose quite some more stuff.
>> My understanding is that the big drive for Zope 2.12 was to get it
>> egg-based. That is now done, so lets get it out the door.
>> I think Zope 2.13 would be an excellent target for moving to ZTK 1.0.
>> There's no reason Zope 2.13 shouldn't follow as quickly after 2.12 as it
>> is able, but I also see no reason to hold up 2.12 waiting for something
>> which has no defined end point.
> I strongly object  inflationary  Zope 2 releases.

Well, this isn't inflationary, is it? 2.12 is eggified. That deserves
a new version number.
If we then after that start changing how acquisition work, that also
needs a new version number.

Lennart Regebro: Python, Zope, Plone, Grok
+33 661 58 14 64
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to