On 29.04.2009 16:51 Uhr, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 16:09, Andreas Jung <li...@zopyx.com> wrote:
>> On 29.04.2009 15:28 Uhr, Chris Withers wrote:
>>> Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>>>> Chris Withers wrote:
>>>>> I'm also about -sys.maxint on these changes for Zope 2.12 as I'd like to
>>>>> see 2.12 out the door as soon as possible.
>>>> Then we have a conflict of interest. My main goal for Zope 2.12 is to be
>>>> based on the Zope Toolkit 1.0 release and loose quite some more stuff.
>>> My understanding is that the big drive for Zope 2.12 was to get it
>>> egg-based. That is now done, so lets get it out the door.
>>> I think Zope 2.13 would be an excellent target for moving to ZTK 1.0.
>>> There's no reason Zope 2.13 shouldn't follow as quickly after 2.12 as it
>>> is able, but I also see no reason to hold up 2.12 waiting for something
>>> which has no defined end point.
>> I strongly object inflationary Zope 2 releases.
> Well, this isn't inflationary, is it? 2.12 is eggified. That deserves
> a new version number.
> If we then after that start changing how acquisition work, that also
> needs a new version number.
We would have to maintain four different major release of Zope:
2.10, 2.11, 2.12 and 2.13. Support for 2.10 can't be dropped
since it is the requirement for Plone 3.X. A new major Zope 2.13 can be
when there are enough valuable features and changes that satisfy a new
ZOPYX Ltd. & Co. KG - Charlottenstr. 37/1 - 72070 Tübingen - Germany
Web: www.zopyx.com - Email: i...@zopyx.com - Phone +49 - 7071 - 793376
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, Handelsregister A 381535
Geschäftsführer/Gesellschafter: ZOPYX Limited, Birmingham, UK
E-Publishing, Python, Zope & Plone development, Consulting
org:ZOPYX Ltd. & Co. KG
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -