Hanno Schlichting wrote: > I kind of suspect that we are seeing the results of > http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0353 though.
That is very likely. BTW, that PEP links to a handy tool that reveals most 64 bit portability issues in Python-oriented C code. >>From what I understand we need to change code in C extension modules > following the instructions in that PEP, to be able to run code > reliably on 64-bit platforms. To my knowledge nobody changed any C > code in Zope yet to do so. We fixed the C portability problems in Zope 3 a while back, but it seems we didn't fix the extensions that are specific to Zope 2. > The other interesting bit to this is, that it seems doable but hard to > do these changes while preserving compatibility with Python 2.4. These > changes along with the definition of "Py_ssize_t" were introduced into > Python 2.5. Preprocessor macros solve that fairly cleanly, actually: #ifndef Py_ssize_t #define Py_ssize_t int #endif > At this point I think we need to declare 64-bit platforms as > unsupported. Hopefully people with the right kind of knowledge would > like to step up and start working on these issues. I just checked in some code that solves the portability problem in zope.index, although I haven't created a release. It looks like the Acquisition module needs some 64 bit TLC. Shane _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )