Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 09:53:51AM -0400, Benji York wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Marius Gedminas <mar...@gedmin.as> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 04:23:31PM -0400, Benji York wrote:
>>>> 3) [no] superfluous version bumps on the trunk
>>> I don't understand this one.  Could you elaborate?
>> The current practice is that after doing a release you have to change
>> the trunk version to the next release number (a version bump).
> Right, but where does the "superfluous" come from?  You'd have to change
> it to 0 anywa...
> Ah, I just realized that you do the version change on the branch/tag, so
> trunk always stays at version 0.
> (I don't do that out of principle that tags ought not to be modified;
> and besides in other VCSes they can't be.)

That's an interesting point. So if we were to adopt another version 
control system, the 0 policy wouldn't be much of a win anymore. Perhaps 
Gary can tell us whether this would work with bzr?

(I think zest.releaser also does the version bumping before tagging if 
I'm not mistaken, even with SVN.)



Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to