* 2009-10-09 15:37, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> I'm okay with *not* doing the split up and going with your idea, but I
> think eventually such a split up would simplify things. One advantage
> would be that someone could examine repoze.zcml and not see distracting
> ZCML implementations in zope.component *too*.
I may be wrong, but I suppose the dependency on zope.security in
zope.component is the only reason why repoze.zcml is around.
I tried to implement my idea here:
This is a quite intrusive change, so please take it as a "suggestion" and
not as a real proposal: is this the right approach? I did not (yet) write
all the tests needed (and I don't like the idea of duplicating the tests in
zcml_conditional.txt, to be honest).
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -