On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Martijn Faassen <faas...@startifact.com> wrote: > And let's please not turn this around: I'm not putting anything *in*. > Something was *removed*. Let's remove it responsibly. Not just disclaim > responsibility and drop it all.
So far I defined the ZTK based on what we wrote on http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/about/coreextra.html. I never considered those zope.app packages to be part of the ZTK. For me that was only a technical implementation detail on how to actually get to something that fullfils those criteria about core packages. But it seems our understanding is different and you want the responsibility of moving Zope 3 users over to the ZTK to be the responsibility of the ZTK. I don't agree with that, but that's my problem :) To be able to make more actual progress I moved Zope2 off the toolkit for now and we'll continue on our own. If at some point the ZTK offers a package set, that is actually anywhere close to what Zope2 uses, we can consider using it again. From my Zope2/Plone perspective I'm just not interested at all in any zope.app code anymore. Hanno _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
