On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Brian Sutherland
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 11:19:52AM -0500, Benji York wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Brian Sutherland
>> <br...@vanguardistas.net> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 10:09:26AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
>> >> In the specific case of zope.event, I'd prefer it stay separate. I
>> >> want developers to be able to publish events without having to commit
>> >> to a subscription mechanism. For example, ZODB depends on zope.event
>> >> so it can generate events and provide a generic hook mechanism. I
>> >> don't want it to depend on zope.component.
>> > I just committed a jinty-optional-event branch for zope.component that's
>> > an experiment as to how to make the dependency on zope.event optional.
>> Maybe I'm missing something, but zope.event is so minimal I can't see
>> that making optional is worth the effort.
> Actually, I misunderstood your question.
Good, because while reading you're response I was so confused I worried
that I had recently had a stroke and not realized it yet.
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -