On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Brian Sutherland <br...@vanguardistas.net> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 11:19:52AM -0500, Benji York wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Brian Sutherland >> <br...@vanguardistas.net> wrote: >> > On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 10:09:26AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote: >> >> In the specific case of zope.event, I'd prefer it stay separate. I >> >> want developers to be able to publish events without having to commit >> >> to a subscription mechanism. For example, ZODB depends on zope.event >> >> so it can generate events and provide a generic hook mechanism. I >> >> don't want it to depend on zope.component. >> > >> > I just committed a jinty-optional-event branch for zope.component that's >> > an experiment as to how to make the dependency on zope.event optional. >> >> Maybe I'm missing something, but zope.event is so minimal I can't see >> that making optional is worth the effort. > > Actually, I misunderstood your question.
Good, because while reading you're response I was so confused I worried that I had recently had a stroke and not realized it yet. -- Benji York _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
