On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 09:01:58AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Christian Theune <c...@gocept.com> wrote:
> > I wonder what Jim thinks about the topic.
> I have mixed feelings.  Accessing environment variables seems
> reasonable on some level, however:
> - I'd worry about the choice of the virtual section name. "env" or
>   "environment" seems too likely to break existing buildouts.
> - I worry a bit about making buildout's "programming language"
>   even more sophisticated.
> Florian, can you describe why you want to use environment variables in 
> extends?

The mail written during lunchtime made it out before I read this one...

Florian Friesdorf <f...@chaoflow.net>
  GPG FPR: EA5C F2B4 FBBB BA65 3DCD  E8ED 82A1 6522 4A1F 4367
Jabber/XMPP: f...@chaoflow.net
  OTR FPR: 9E191746 213321FE C896B37D 24B118C0 31785700
IRC: chaoflow on freenode,ircnet,blafasel,OFTC

Attachment: pgpGXhmMsnbP6.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to