On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 09:01:58AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote: > On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Christian Theune <c...@gocept.com> wrote: > > I wonder what Jim thinks about the topic. > > I have mixed feelings. Accessing environment variables seems > reasonable on some level, however: > > - I'd worry about the choice of the virtual section name. "env" or > "environment" seems too likely to break existing buildouts. > > - I worry a bit about making buildout's "programming language" > even more sophisticated. > > Florian, can you describe why you want to use environment variables in > extends?
The mail written during lunchtime made it out before I read this one... -- Florian Friesdorf <f...@chaoflow.net> GPG FPR: EA5C F2B4 FBBB BA65 3DCD E8ED 82A1 6522 4A1F 4367 Jabber/XMPP: f...@chaoflow.net OTR FPR: 9E191746 213321FE C896B37D 24B118C0 31785700 IRC: chaoflow on freenode,ircnet,blafasel,OFTC
pgpGXhmMsnbP6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
