Hi,

On 04/09/2010 07:38 PM, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> On Apr 9, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Fred Drake wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Tres Seaver<tsea...@palladion.com>  wrote:
>>> It seems reasonable to me that it *should* work, though I'm not sure how to 
>>> write the code which tests that.
>>
>> See my later follow-up as well.
>>
>> In particular, while it *may* be reasonable to set the ZF as
>> maintainer, it's not clear that it's the right thing either.  Why
>> shouldn't some "Grok Team" be listed as the maintainer for the grok
>> packages, with an appropriate email?  That seems preferable to me.
>>
>> I think the *right* thing to do is update the copyrights to reflect
>> the copyright ownership, but not to otherwise change package metadata.
>
> Why was the check for author even included in the checker/fixer scripts?
> Can you point us to the Zope Foundation bylaws or a policy document that 
> requires this?
>
> I cannot find this in a contributor agreement.

Pondering it this is an overzealous misunderstanding on my part. I'm 
removing the assertion.

Christian

-- 
Christian Theune · c...@gocept.com
gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany
http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 0 · fax +49 345 1229889 1
Zope and Plone consulting and development

_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to