Hi, On 04/09/2010 07:38 PM, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote: > On Apr 9, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Fred Drake wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Tres Seaver<tsea...@palladion.com> wrote: >>> It seems reasonable to me that it *should* work, though I'm not sure how to >>> write the code which tests that. >> >> See my later follow-up as well. >> >> In particular, while it *may* be reasonable to set the ZF as >> maintainer, it's not clear that it's the right thing either. Why >> shouldn't some "Grok Team" be listed as the maintainer for the grok >> packages, with an appropriate email? That seems preferable to me. >> >> I think the *right* thing to do is update the copyrights to reflect >> the copyright ownership, but not to otherwise change package metadata. > > Why was the check for author even included in the checker/fixer scripts? > Can you point us to the Zope Foundation bylaws or a policy document that > requires this? > > I cannot find this in a contributor agreement.
Pondering it this is an overzealous misunderstanding on my part. I'm removing the assertion. Christian -- Christian Theune · c...@gocept.com gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 0 · fax +49 345 1229889 1 Zope and Plone consulting and development _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )