On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 19:17, Tres Seaver <tsea...@palladion.com> wrote: > I'm ambivalent about testing the Sphinx code snippets on each test run. > I want those snippets to be *much* less comprehensive than they are > currently, and am pretty sure that drift in the non-executable bits is > at least as important a problem as drift in the snippets.
Well, unless they take of time, but they shouldn't, really. I think it's positive to get a quick feedback if you are breaking the documentation. > +0 on running them every time IFF we can find an easy way to run them > during 'setup.py test' as well as buildout, and we continue to be > mindful of the distinction between docs that work primarily as docs and > tests that cover every code path. I think manuel should solve that, we'll see, I'll have to test. I need to get manuel ported to Python 3 then too. :) -- Lennart Regebro: http://regebro.wordpress.com/ Python 3 Porting: http://python-incompatibility.googlecode.com/ +33 661 58 14 64 _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )