On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 19:17, Tres Seaver <tsea...@palladion.com> wrote:
> I'm ambivalent about testing the Sphinx code snippets on each test run.
>  I want those snippets to be *much* less comprehensive than they are
> currently, and am pretty sure that drift in the non-executable bits is
> at least as important a problem as drift in the snippets.

Well, unless they take of time, but they shouldn't, really. I think
it's positive to get a quick feedback if you are breaking the
documentation.

> +0 on running them every time IFF we can find an easy way to run them
> during 'setup.py test' as well as buildout, and we continue to be
> mindful of the distinction between docs that work primarily as docs and
> tests that cover every code path.

I think manuel should solve that, we'll see, I'll have to test.
I need to get manuel ported to Python 3 then too. :)

-- 
Lennart Regebro: http://regebro.wordpress.com/
Python 3 Porting: http://python-incompatibility.googlecode.com/
+33 661 58 14 64
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to