-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 19:17, Tres Seaver <tsea...@palladion.com> wrote:
>> I'm ambivalent about testing the Sphinx code snippets on each test run.
>> I want those snippets to be *much* less comprehensive than they are
>> currently, and am pretty sure that drift in the non-executable bits is
>> at least as important a problem as drift in the snippets.
> Well, unless they take of time, but they shouldn't, really. I think
> it's positive to get a quick feedback if you are breaking the
Again, I don't mind that part, but I want to break the cycle of jamming
crap (for documentation purposes) into the docs for purposes of getting
>> +0 on running them every time IFF we can find an easy way to run them
>> during 'setup.py test' as well as buildout, and we continue to be
>> mindful of the distinction between docs that work primarily as docs and
>> tests that cover every code path.
> I think manuel should solve that, we'll see, I'll have to test.
> I need to get manuel ported to Python 3 then too. :)
Turtles all the way down. ;)
Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -