On 08/10/2010 12:37 AM, Sidnei da Silva wrote: > On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Marius Gedminas<mar...@gedmin.as> wrote: >> I've added ETag support for zope.browserresource in a branch: >> http://zope3.pov.lt/trac/changeset/115596 >> >> Does anybody have any comments/objections? If not, I'd like to merge >> this to trunk and release zope.browserresource 3.11.0. > > +1 as long as there's a way to disable or configure how it's computed. > There's some information about issues with ETags here: > > http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html#etags > > I see that your implementation uses last-modified + size, which should > generally be fine. However if you're load-balancing across two > different servers and the timestamps don't match then the ETag is > useless. > > On a completely different note, I see that the File object reads the > whole file into memory. Hum. Maybe RAM is cheaper than Disk these days > and it doesn't matter, but reading whole files into memory generally > raises a red flag for me.
IOPS aren't cheap nowadays. The IOPS/MB have had the issue that the MB kept increasing a lot in disks but the IOPS didn't catch up that much, so it may not even be a RAM issue but throughput/caching/IOPS. -- Christian Theune · c...@gocept.com gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 0 · fax +49 345 1229889 1 Zope and Plone consulting and development _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )