I am in favor of removing the trunks.
People who do not want to switch to git can still get the trunk by pinning
to a specific revision.
I run a CI tool and it is broken already because apparently a trunk has
been deleted already.
Thats not a bug, thats why I run the CI Tool. Would be stupid if I continue
to test a trunk not in use.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Jim Fulton <j...@zope.com> wrote:
> I'd like us to agree on how we're going to indicate in SVN
> that projects have been moved to github.
> Here's an opening bid:
> - Replace contents of trunk with a single file MOVED_TO_GITHUB
> containing the URL if the project page in github
> - Copy above file to root of project.
> - Make project read only
> An argument against cleaning out trunk will break
> CI tools. This is also an argument *for* cleaning
> out trunk. :)
> There are a lot of other details of the migration that need
> to be worked out, like how folks should request migration and
> automating the conversion further.
> Jim Fulton
> Jerky is better than bacon! http://zo.pe/Kqm
> Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
> ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
> (Related lists -
> https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -