On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Tres Seaver <tsea...@palladion.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> On 01/10/2013 10:42 AM, Patrick Gerken wrote:
>> I am in favor of removing the trunks. People who do not want to switch
>> to git can still get the trunk by pinning to a specific revision. I
>> run a CI tool and it is broken already because apparently a trunk has
>> been deleted already. Thats not a bug, thats why I run the CI Tool.
>> Would be stupid if I continue to test a trunk not in use.
> It isn't just CI: people may have projects running from SVN checkouts,
> which we break without warning (the Plone devs have been notorious for
> causing such breakage for years).
I still think breakage is better. If they're using trunk, without
pinning a revision, it must be because they want the latest code.
They won't get that from svn. This is a case where I think it's
better to fail in an obvious way.
Jerky is better than bacon! http://zo.pe/Kqm
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -