On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 06:30 -0800, Martin Aspeli wrote: > > Sidnei da Silva-2 wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 04:34:21AM -0800, Martin Aspeli wrote: > > | ...(it was based on Plone, sure, but it was badly mangled from > > | what I've been told to the point where the Plone community would no > > longer > > | be able to help maintain it). > > > > Call that a hoax. Other than the skin, and custom products on top of > > it, and a custom workflow I can't think of any customization that > > would make it unmantainable. > > > > Not sure what this means ... were you involved in building the current site > or do you know its architecture? As I've said, my comments are based on what > I've been told by people who were involved in the original decision to use > Plone (pre 1.0 as I understand, with heavy internal customisations). My > feeling is exactly that there's no *need* for zope.org customisations that > would make it hard to maintain/migrate in the same way plone.org is > maintained and migrated right now. I believe it is pre 1.0 - but I don't think outside of the previous reply to Sidnei (i.e. skins customizations) there is a lot of customizations. I'm certain it's a problem of general look (which is solved by Tom V.) and crap content which is useless to promoting the technology in a sensible manner.
Andrew > > Martin > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Zope-2-web-site-t1182227.html#a3262596 > Sent from the Zope - web forum at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > Zope-web maillist - [email protected] > http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-web _______________________________________________ Zope-web maillist - [email protected] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-web
