Garrett Smith wrote:
> Jim Fulton wrote:
>> Garrett Smith wrote:
>>> :-) I guess this approach is *so* endemic to Zope 3, I must be
>>> missing something huge.
>> What we're talking about is not very different from the way that
>> composition is used to prevent explosition of field types.
>> For example, we use: List(Int()) rather than IntegerList.
>> Note that we use a combination of type and composition,
>> hopefully striking a good balence.
> I see your point.
> But events are essentially an API and a well defined contract is
> better than an implicit one. I think we're going to see a lot code
> that looks like this:
> if not 'my stuff' in event.extra:
I take this back -- we can always provide a multi-adapter delegator.
That's actually pretty nice.
> I also think this is being driven by the "I can imagine..." syndrome.
I'm still concerned about WHUI. What in the core can be replaced with
this new model?
Zope3-dev mailing list