Behalf Of Philipp von Weitershausen
> Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 4:42 PM
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Make <widget /> subdirective
> supportsequence/items widgets
> Hi there,
> it's quite confusing that sequence widgets and items widgets (such as
> SelectWidget, DropdownWidget, etc.) cannot be specified in
> the <widget
> /> subdirective of the addform and editform directives. I actually
> consider it a bug because documentation and implementation are saying
> something different. Rather than changing the documentation
> by limiting
> the use of <widget /> to the simple form fields, I have added changed
> the directive handler to support both sequence widgets and vocabulary
> widgets on the philikon-widget-subdirective branch.
> The idea of the change is the following:
> Normal widgets's __init__ take (field, request) like a
> regular browser
> view. Sequence widgets take (field, value_type, request) because they
> are multiviews for (field, value_type) and vocabulary widgets take
> (field, vocabulary, request) because they are multiviews for (field,
> I have created a CustomVocabularyWidgetFactory like
> CustomSequenceWidgetFactory. All factories, including
> CustomWidgetFactory, comply with the IViewFactory interface, however
> (which means their __call__ takes (context, request)). That
> means that
> API backward compatability with CustomSequenceWidgetFactory
> is broken.
> However, since the latter was only introduced on the trunk
> recently, I
> would think it's ok to break it. I also think API conformity is to be
> valued highly here.
> I have also created two new interfaces, ISequenceWidgetFactory and
> IVocabularyWidgetFactory. The sequence widget classes *provide* the
> former, the vocabulary widget classes *provide* the latter (not
> implement!). Now, when you use the <widget /> directive, it chooses
> either CustomSequenceWidgetFactory or CustomVocabularyWidgetFactory
> according to which interface the given widget class provides.
> That way,
> widget classes are always called with the right number of
> arguments when
> <widget /> is used.
> I have implemented these changes on a branch because they break API
> backward compabatility on CustomSequenceWidgetFactory. Before I merge
> these changes, I would like to hear your comments, especially from
> people who are heavily involved into forms (Roger, Garret,
> ...?). Given
> no objections, I can merge anytime. The branch is ready.
This sounds really great...
I don't have had time for taking a look at it. I hope I can
do it tomorrow at our sprint in Solothurn and give you feedback.
Thanks a lot
> Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev mailing list