Stephan Richter wrote: > On Wednesday 23 November 2005 21:48, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > > Note that I also understand your motivation on voting -1 quite well. > > Leaving everything as it is is simply the easier thing to do. For the > > moment... > > I will always vote -1 on such a move. I just simply punishes all those early > adopters of Zope 3 and throw it in their face. Great appreciation!
You know I can turn this around and say that by focusing all development on Zope 3, the Zope development team left Zope 2 out there to die in its old ways of doing things, despite the fact that some sort of transition capabilities were promised for a long time (maybe I needed to remind of you of this...). A rewrite from scratch is always easy, but dealing with the transition and deprecations is the hard work which is now left up to people who were early adopters of Zope *2* and hoping for that promised transition. Great appreciation! As you can see, this angle at looking things doesn't get us anywhere and I would rather not pursue it further. What I want is a sensible transition for the future. And it's not like Zope 2 people aren't willing to put an effort in it... Philipp ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list [email protected] Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
