Benji York wrote at 2005-11-25 11:17 -0500:
>They are clear in what they say, but they do not say that a user of
>zope.testbrowser shouldn't depend on them and that they may go away at
>any time. Even if it did I don't think that would be sufficient, I
>don't think the docs should mention mechanize (or any other unofficial
>parts of the API) at all. I wonder what other's opinions are on this.
I do not share your opinion.
As a rare case, I am with Chris:
If an essential use case (testing file uploads seems quite essential)
requires a feature that is there only tentatively,
then this tentative feature should be documented with
the warning that it may be replaced (by something better) in the
Zope3-dev mailing list