Benji York wrote at 2005-11-25 11:17 -0500: > ... >They are clear in what they say, but they do not say that a user of >zope.testbrowser shouldn't depend on them and that they may go away at >any time. Even if it did I don't think that would be sufficient, I >don't think the docs should mention mechanize (or any other unofficial >parts of the API) at all. I wonder what other's opinions are on this.
I do not share your opinion. As a rare case, I am with Chris: If an essential use case (testing file uploads seems quite essential) requires a feature that is there only tentatively, then this tentative feature should be documented with the warning that it may be replaced (by something better) in the future. -- Dieter _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list [email protected] Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
