On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 09:42:31PM +1100, Rob Jeschofnik wrote: > Paul Winkler wrote: > >"Mac OSX" in itself, on the other hand, was brilliant. > >With one letter they managed to establish: > > > [...] > > Right... but that is a brand, not a codename. > As I understand it, people are discussing things like "Tiger", and > "Panther", to follow your example.
Both codenames and brands are under discussion here. As I said before, I'm +0 on enhancing the brand, -1 on adding release codenames. IMO codenames make it harder, not easier, to talk about releases. Which came first - Cheetah or Puma? I submit that nobody but a certified mac geek can answer that question without googling it. -- Paul Winkler http://www.slinkp.com _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3email@example.com Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com