Lennart Regebro wrote: > On 2/13/06, Philipp von Weitershausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yet again looking for comments, this time at: > > http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/OneNamespaceForZCML. > > What happens if you want to add your own statements? Should you still > do that in your own namespace?
No. But I don't think that it'll be much of a problem. I expect that not a lot of 3rd party packages will need their own set of ZCML directives. I would certainly not encourage it and I will continue not to document it in my book. ZCML is a good tool, but only with a certain limited functionality (that was its intention in the first place!). That includes a somewhat limited set of directives. I realize "somewhat" is fuzzy. Let me just say that I think ZCML has failed when Plone will have its own ZCML directives... > If not, how are we going to make sure we don't get conflicts? By choosing decent names for the few directives that will be necessary. I know, it sounds lame, but even *with* namespace you'd need decent names. Or does anything prevent me in my own package to register a ZCML directive called browser:viewlet? Nope. So, it doesn't make much of a difference with or w/o namespaces. Philipp ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
