Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Philipp von Weitershausen wrote at 2006-3-5 18:17 +0100:
>>Looking at your examples (especially the long one), I find the ZConfig
>>version much easier to read.
> While ZConfig allows you the describe related material together
> and without indirections, the ConfigParser format forces you
> to introduce indirections and to spread related definitions
> over a longer area.
Yes, this was my concern with it, too. Though the decouple spelling
obviously also has advantages as you can configure a server once and
then just refer to this server configuration from several instance
Zope3-dev mailing list