On Feb 28, 2006, at 7:39 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
So, my proposal would be to tone down the vision to what we have
already: a co-evolving Zope 3 and Zope 2, with Zope 2 following and
Zope 3 leading (or Zope 2 driving Zope 3 forward, however you want
to see it). No renaming necessary. No change of course necessary.
Zope 2 can stick to Zope 2 features as long as necessary so there's
no rush to replicate Zope 2 functionality in Zope 3 any time soon.
At the same time, Zope 2 requirements can drive the evolution of
I know I sound conservative here, but I'm actually happy with the
way things are working now. Let's not fix what isn't broken. We can
make incremental steps to making it better, and I'm glad people are
starting to understand the ideas behind Five, but I don't see the
need for a change of direction.
"Zoping for the rest of us"
Zope3-dev mailing list