Dominik Huber wrote: > Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > >> * class/implements and class/factory weren't removed -- yet. I guess >> removing these might be a bit controversial. I'd therefore like to take >> this opportunity to bring this topic up again and to give everyone a >> chance to look at the proposal once again, before I start spending lots >> of time on the implementation. > > I'm -1 on moving <implements> out of the class directive
Why? With a top-level <implements> directive, we get to deal with more general cases (not only classes can implement interfaces, functions can too). It will also let us get rid of the Five-specific five:implements directive for which there seems to be no good reason to be in the five namespace. With "Reducing the Amount of ZCML Directives" I'm looking mostly at consolidation of the existing stuff. > and I'm still -1 on removing the factory subdirective. Would you care to explain why? I couldn't find a previous comment from you on that. Philipp _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
