-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> Christian Theune wrote:
>> see subject. What's the reason that all three flavours (still?) exist? I
>> just had a really hard time finding the spelling I need.
> ztapi.provideUtility(interface, component) is discouraged and should go
> away. I didn't do this for Zope 3.3 because of a lack of time.
> zope.component.provideUtility(component, interface=optional) is a
> convenience spelling for:
> component, interface=optional).
> The order of arguments is the same. I think Jim wants the convenience
> functions in zope.component (provide*) to go away in favor of the
> explicit spelling through the global site manager. I think that before
> we do that, we should first abolish the term "site manager" from the
> zope.component API (because we don't call it site manager anymore).
Hmm. Hmm. zope.component.provide* is *very* convenient. What would the
new spelling be?
Isn't the global site manager something else then zope.component?
Because zope.component uses the current thread-local site-manager,
depending on what was set during traversal etc., isn't it?
gocept gmbh & co. kg - forsterstraße 29 - 06112 halle/saale - germany
www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 -
fax +49 345 122 9889 1 - zope and plone consulting and development
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v220.127.116.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Zope3-dev mailing list