Hello Gary, OK, my mistake. Then I'll do like a).
Friday, November 17, 2006, 4:46:09 PM, you wrote: GP> On Nov 17, 2006, at 10:23 AM, Adam Groszer wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Solutions: >> >> a: No, do not keep None values in the catalog >> the current implementation works like this >> you are unable to ask the catalog for objects having None >> properties >> b: Yes, keep None values in the catalog >> you can ask the catalog for objects having None properties >> c: Let's keep the existing one that does not index None and have an >> AttributeIndexAlsoNone class which will index None values GP> Did you see my reply in the other thread? GP> If you make indexes keep track of None, it will need to be done in a GP> separate data structure because of the key homogeneity issues. This GP> is a less efficient approach than the zc.catalog approach. It can be GP> done either way. GP> I recommend that you use zc.catalog, rather than reinventing GP> something that solves your problem. GP> I suppose I don't care much, since we don't use the standard zope GP> value and keyword indexes anyway; if you must add the None feature, GP> then I only care, from a "let's not screw up our community software" GP> perspective, that it be implemented in a safe way. Keep your BTree GP> keys homogenous. GP> Gary -- Best regards, Groszer Adam -- Quote of the day: I just need enough to tide me over until I need more. - Bill Hoest _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
