Gary Poster wrote:
> On Nov 17, 2006, at 11:29 AM, Adam Groszer wrote:
> 
>> Hello Gary,
>>
>> At the moment it is
>> try:
>>     value = value()
>> except:
>>     return None
>>
>> So that will eat the exception without any signs.
>> That makes me also glum when I have to dig deep to discover that
>> something ate an exception.
>>
>> I propose to remove the try/except.
>> Is that OK?
> 
> Yes, I think removing the bare try...except is definitely the right  
> thing to do.  (Anyone care to disagree?)

Would that change the status of this to be a feature change instead of a
bug fix?

(I'd argue it's still a candidate for a bug fix, but people might rely
on this behavior in existing applications which makes it more of a
feature change.)

-- 
gocept gmbh & co. kg - forsterstra├če 29 - 06112 halle/saale - germany
www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 -
fax +49 345 122 9889 1 - zope and plone consulting and development


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to