Gary Poster wrote: > On Nov 17, 2006, at 11:29 AM, Adam Groszer wrote: > >> Hello Gary, >> >> At the moment it is >> try: >> value = value() >> except: >> return None >> >> So that will eat the exception without any signs. >> That makes me also glum when I have to dig deep to discover that >> something ate an exception. >> >> I propose to remove the try/except. >> Is that OK? > > Yes, I think removing the bare try...except is definitely the right > thing to do. (Anyone care to disagree?)
Would that change the status of this to be a feature change instead of a bug fix? (I'd argue it's still a candidate for a bug fix, but people might rely on this behavior in existing applications which makes it more of a feature change.) -- gocept gmbh & co. kg - forsterstraße 29 - 06112 halle/saale - germany www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 - fax +49 345 122 9889 1 - zope and plone consulting and development
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
