On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 08:55:17AM +0000, Chris Withers wrote: > Marius Gedminas wrote: > >BTW passing interfaces to provideAdapter/<adapts> is out of fashion. > > This stuff is getting almost perl-ish in it's "there's many ways to do > it, pick the style you like" nature..
There's a slight difference, I think. In the Zope 3 world, there's usually one style that is considered to be the best way of doing stuff. Only it varies with time and with individual Zope 3 developers. ;-) > >I > >prefer using zope.component.adapts and zope.interface.implements (or > >zope.component.adapter and zope.interface.implementer, when my adapter > >is a function rather than a class). > > I often register the same adapter factory for several different types or > objects / interfaces. How would I do that with your favoured spelling? If you pass the adapts/provides arguments to provideAdapter (or the ZCML directive), the values you specify override the defaults declared by the adapter itself. Marius Gedminas -- Some people have told me they don't think a fat penguin really embodies the grace of Linux, which just tells me they have never seen a angry penguin charging at them in excess of 100mph. They'd be a lot more careful about what they say if they had. -- Linus Torvalds, announcing Linux v2.0
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3email@example.com Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com