Philipp von Weitershausen wrote at 2007-5-31 22:04 +0200: > ... >>>>> How about >>>>> >>>>> foo 2.>=5 >>>> >>>> This seems really weird to me. >>>> >>>> I much prefer: "foo 2, >=2.5" >>> >>> Would you be able to write >>> >>> foo 2.4, >=2.4.3 >> >> Yup. > >Hmm, ok, then I'm at least not against it. But I still think my >variant is shorter and more self-explanatory.
It, definitely, is shorter -- but I cannot see why it should be self-explanatory. It severely bends the usual meaning of ">=": I associate it strongly with a binary operator -- and "2.>=5" goes strongly against this association. -- Dieter _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
