--On 31. Mai 2007 20:08:02 +0200 Dieter Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Jim Fulton wrote at 2007-5-31 10:12 -0400:

In thinking about how we might specify that we want to depend on
major versions but sometimes need to specify minimum versions, the
following occurred to me:

- Suppose that we always had access to the latest released version,

- Suppose that, within a major release, all releases were backward

Then I assert that there is no *need* to specify a minimum release
within a major release.

I fear my colleagues responsible to maintain the productive versions
would not be happy:

  They want the system to be as stable as possible.

  If they need to introduce a new component, they usually
  prefer to just add this one component. Only if this forces
  other updates, they reluctantly will make them.

The motivation for this behaviour: even if a newer version
is supposed to be backward compatible, it often has slightly different
behaviour which may trigger bugs in the other parts of a complex system.

That's why one should have enough tests...although tests will never
cover all cases.


Attachment: pgpt1WGkPLSoR.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Zope3-dev mailing list
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to