Martin Aspeli wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
I'm very much against making setuptools *more* complicated than it
already is.
Indeed, but surely managing "known good" sets of components comes
under its remit of version management?
Sure. It does this via requirements.
Ok, forgive me for being dumb then, but why are we looking to add
similar to zc.buildout?
We're talking more about a general pattern in zc.buildout. The
deficiencies of using setup.py for this alone are described well in the
original proposal.
Yup, and this was the reason for my original question to Jim: why do
something in zc.buildout rather than fixing the problems with setuptools?
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
_______________________________________________
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com