On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 09:09:37PM -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
> Why does the caller care?  She just wants an object which will provide
> the 'IFoo' contract on behalf of the passed context.  If 'x' is capable
> of providing 'IFoo' without help, then failing (or worse, returning a
> less-specific factory result) when calling 'getAdapter' is the Wrong
> Thing (a "least surprise" violation, if nothing else).

FWIW it was a big surprise to me when I discovered that IFoo(x) has
different semantics from getAdapter(x, IFoo).

Marius Gedminas
-- 
C is for Cookies.  Perl is even better for Cookies.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to